Attrition Bites, Hormuz Burns
Two weeks: missiles down 90%, navy gutted, air superiority unchallenged. But Hormuz is still closed, oil above $100, 14 countries involved. KC-135 crash kills 6 aircrew. Bahrain airport struck. FPV drones on US bases in Iraq. P004, P010, P013 confirmed. P008 refuted (timing too aggressive).
Scored
P008: rate hit ~25/day by Day 14 - close to threshold but not by Day 10 deadline. Directionally correct, too aggressive on timing.
New Predictions
Standalone Predictions
Endgame Scenarios
Divergence between military and strategic outcomes: Iran is being physically dismantled (missiles down 90%, navy gone) yet Hormuz is still closed, oil above $100, and US casualties accumulating. Regional war ticks up on the Bahrain airport strike and Turkey NATO incident. Regime collapse dips as Mojtaba's succession and public address suggest the system is holding under pressure.
Adversarial Review
The session correctly identifies the central paradox of Day 14: Iran is being physically destroyed yet strategically holds the Hormuz chokepoint. But the framing is lopsided - Iranian attrition gets the headline while US attrition (interceptors at 40% THAAD depletion, 6,000+ munitions expended in 16 days) goes unmentioned. The KC-135 incident was a midair collision between two tankers, not a simple crash, which tells a more significant story about operational strain than the session explores. The prediction work is honest - the P008 miss is forthrightly scored and the P011 contradiction was already self-flagged in Session 003. Where both the session and this review converge: the divergence between tactical success and strategic stalemate is real, and the session deserves credit for naming it clearly even if it doesn't follow the thread to US sustainability questions.